Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;98(8):1073-9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304615. Epub 2014 Apr 11.

Cone photoreceptor definition on adaptive optics retinal imaging.

Author information

1
National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, London, UK Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK Division of Cellular Therapy, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
2
Division of Cellular Therapy, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
3
Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
4
Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
5
Department of Research and Development, The Reading Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
6
National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, London, UK Department of Research and Development, The Reading Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.

Abstract

AIMS:

To quantitatively analyse cone photoreceptor matrices on images captured on an adaptive optics (AO) camera and assess their correlation to well-established parameters in the retinal histology literature.

METHODS:

High resolution retinal images were acquired from 10 healthy subjects, aged 20-35 years old, using an AO camera (rtx1, Imagine Eyes, France). Left eye images were captured at 5° of retinal eccentricity, temporal to the fovea for consistency. In three subjects, images were also acquired at 0, 2, 3, 5 and 7° retinal eccentricities. Cone photoreceptor density was calculated following manual and automated counting. Inter-photoreceptor distance was also calculated. Voronoi domain and power spectrum analyses were performed for all images.

RESULTS:

At 5° eccentricity, the cone density (cones/mm(2) mean±SD) was 15.3±1.4×10(3) (automated) and 13.9±1.0×10(3) (manual) and the mean inter-photoreceptor distance was 8.6±0.4 μm. Cone density decreased and inter-photoreceptor distance increased with increasing retinal eccentricity from 2 to 7°. A regular hexagonal cone photoreceptor mosaic pattern was seen at 2, 3 and 5° of retinal eccentricity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Imaging data acquired from the AO camera match cone density, intercone distance and show the known features of cone photoreceptor distribution in the pericentral retina as reported by histology, namely, decreasing density values from 2 to 7° of eccentricity and the hexagonal packing arrangement. This confirms that AO flood imaging provides reliable estimates of pericentral cone photoreceptor distribution in normal subjects.

KEYWORDS:

Adaptive Optics; Cone Photoreceptor; Retinal Imaging

PMID:
24729030
PMCID:
PMC4112439
DOI:
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304615
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center