Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Korean J Orthod. 2014 Mar;44(2):69-76. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique.

Author information

1
Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
2
Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
3
Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. ; BK21+ Program in Public Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of polyurethane (PUT) dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) subtractive rapid prototyping (RP) method with an intraoral scanning technique by comparing linear measurements obtained from PUT models and conventional plaster models.

METHODS:

Ten plaster models were duplicated using a selected standard master model and conventional impression, and 10 PUT models were duplicated using the 3D subtractive RP technique with an oral scanner. Six linear measurements were evaluated in terms of x, y, and z-axes using a non-contact white light scanner. Accuracy was assessed using mean differences between two measurements, and precision was examined using four quantitative methods and the Bland-Altman graphical method. Repeatability was evaluated in terms of intra-examiner variability, and reproducibility was assessed in terms of inter-examiner and inter-method variability.

RESULTS:

The mean difference between plaster models and PUT models ranged from 0.07 mm to 0.33 mm. Relative measurement errors ranged from 2.2% to 7.6% and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.93 to 0.96, when comparing plaster models and PUT models. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement.

CONCLUSIONS:

The accuracy and precision of PUT dental models for evaluating the performance of oral scanner and subtractive RP technology was acceptable. Because of the recent improvements in block material and computerized numeric control milling machines, the subtractive RP method may be a good choice for dental arch models.

KEYWORDS:

Accuracy; Intraoral scanning; Precision; Three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for The Korean Association of Orthodontists Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center