Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):823-30. doi: 10.1111/clr.12369. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Buccal bone deficiency in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective single cohort study.

Author information

1
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
2
Tuscan Dental Institute, Versilia General Hospital, Lido di Camaiore, Italy.
3
School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
4
Department of Dentistry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this prospective single cohort study was to evaluate the use of xenograft and collagen membranes in treating full or partial buccal bone defects of fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Thirty-three patients requiring tooth extraction in the anterior maxillary area and showing a complete or partial buccal bone plate deficiency (more than 2 mm) were consecutively enrolled and treated. Corticocancellous porcine bone and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) with a collagen membrane were used to graft the extraction sockets, and the membranes were left exposed to the oral cavity with a secondary soft tissue healing. The outcome variables were as follows: width of keratinized mucosa, facial soft tissue levels, clinical bone changes (measured with a clinical splint), implant and prosthesis failures, and peri-implant marginal bone changes.

RESULTS:

All treated sites allowed the placement of implants; the width of keratinized mucosa at the mid-facial aspect showed an increase of 2.3 mm 5 months after the grafting procedure, and its value was 3.2 ± 0.6 mm at 1-year follow-up. The mean values of the facial soft tissue level indicated an increase over time. The bone level showed an improvement of 0.8 ± 0.1 mm and 0.7 ± 0.1 mm at mesial and distal sites, respectively, when compared to the baseline measurements. Finally, in the palatal area, no bone changes were observed. No implant failed during the entire observation period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings from this study showed that xenograft and PRF, used for ridge preservation of the extraction sockets with buccal bone plate dehiscence in the esthetic zone, can be considered effective in repairing bone defects before implant placement. The secondary soft tissue healing over the grafted sockets did not compromise bone formation; moreover, the soft tissue level and the width of keratinized gingiva showed a significant improvement over time.

KEYWORDS:

alveolar socket; bone augmentation; bone remodeling; platelet-rich fibrin; ridge preservation

PMID:
24684275
DOI:
10.1111/clr.12369
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center