Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e89168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089168. eCollection 2014.

Association between drug insurance cost sharing strategies and outcomes in patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
2
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration Team, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
3
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
4
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration Team, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
5
Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration Team, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
6
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Prescription drugs are used in people with hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease to manage their illness. Patient cost sharing strategies such as copayments and deductibles are often employed to lower expenditures for prescription drug insurance plans, but the impact on health outcomes in these patients is unclear.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the association between drug insurance and patient cost sharing strategies on medication adherence, clinical and economic outcomes in those with chronic diseases (defined herein as diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease).

METHODS:

Studies were included if they examined various cost sharing strategies including copayments, coinsurance, fixed copayments, deductibles and maximum out-of-pocket expenditures. Value-based insurance design and reference based pricing studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified original intervention studies (randomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, and controlled before-after designs). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and relevant reference lists were searched until March 2013. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, quality, and extracted data. Eleven studies, assessing the impact of seven policy changes, were included: 2 separate reports of one randomized controlled trial, 4 interrupted time series, and 5 controlled before-after studies.

FINDINGS:

Outcomes included medication adherence, clinical events (myocardial infarction, stroke, death), quality of life, healthcare utilization, or cost. The heterogeneity among the studies precluded meta-analysis. Few studies reported the impact of cost sharing strategies on mortality, clinical and economic outcomes. The association between patient copayments and medication adherence varied across studies, ranging from no difference to significantly lower adherence, depending on the amount of the copayment.

CONCLUSION:

Lowering cost sharing in patients with chronic diseases may improve adherence, but the impact on clinical and economic outcomes is uncertain.

PMID:
24667163
PMCID:
PMC3965394
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0089168
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center