Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Jun;11(6):1008-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

Outcomes in pacemaker-dependent patients upgraded from conventional pacemakers to cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators.

Author information

University of Pittsburgh Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address:
University of Pittsburgh Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.



Pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular dysfunction benefit from upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Those at low risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias may benefit similarly from upgrade to a CRT-defibrillator or CRT-pacemaker.


To determine whether coronary artery disease (CAD), because of associated scar that supports reentry, predicts higher risk of appropriate shocks in pacemaker-dependent patients upgraded to a CRT-defibrillator.


We grouped 157 pacemaker-dependent patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and conventional pacemakers upgraded to CRT-defibrillators according to the presence (n = 75) or absence (n = 82) of significant CAD. Overall survival, risk of appropriate shocks and antitachycardia pacing, complications related to high-power system components, and LVEF and end-systolic volume changes were contrasted between groups.


Patients with CAD had more comorbidities and exhibited increased mortality during a follow-up of 59 ± 30 months (hazard ratio 2.55; 95% confidence interval 1.49-4.36; P = .001). Of 12 patients with appropriate shocks, 11 had CAD. Time to first shock, antitachycardia pacing, and tachyarrhythmia therapy were significantly shorter in patients with CAD (P < .01). The risk of an appropriate shock in patients without CAD was 1 per 362 person-years compared with 1 shock per 26 person-years in patients with CAD. Complications specific to high-energy device components necessitated another procedure in 32 (20%) patients. LVEF improvement and end-systolic volume reduction were similar between groups.


Among pacemaker-dependent patients with no prior ventricular arrhythmias upgraded from a pacemaker to a CRT-defibrillator, patients without significant CAD have fewer comorbidities, longer survival, and low risk of appropriate shocks than do patients with CAD. CRT-pacemakers may be appropriate in such patients without CAD.


Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Coronary artery disease; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; Pacemakers

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center