Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Toxicol Lett. 2014 May 16;227(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.03.004. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

The sensitivity of metabolomics versus classical regulatory toxicology from a NOAEL perspective.

Author information

1
BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Electronic address: bennard.ravenzwaay@basf.com.
2
BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
3
metanomics GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

The identification of the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) is the key regulatory outcome of toxicity studies. With the introduction of "omics" technologies into toxicological research, the question arises as to how sensitive these technologies are relative to classical regulatory toxicity parameters. BASF SE and metanomics developed the in vivo metabolome database MetaMap®Tox containing metabolome data for more than 500 reference compounds. For several years metabolome analysis has been routinely performed in regulatory toxicity studies (REACH mandated testing or new compound development), mostly in the context of 28 day studies in rats (OECD 407 guideline). For those chemicals for which a toxicological NOAEL level was obtained at either high or mid-dose level, we evaluated the associated metabolome to investigate the sensitivity of metabolomics versus classical toxicology with respect to the NOAEL. For the definition of a metabolomics NOAEL the ECETOC criteria (ECETOC, 2007) were used. In this context we evaluated 104 cases. Comparable sensitivity was noted in 75% of the cases, increased sensitivity of metabolomics in 8%, and decreased sensitivity in 18% of the cases. In conclusion, these data suggest that metabolomics profiling has a similar sensitivity to the classical toxicological study (e.g. OECD 407) design.

KEYWORDS:

Metabolomics; NOAEL, Sensitivity; Toxicology, Rat

PMID:
24657160
DOI:
10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.03.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center