Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;43(4):1294-313. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu047. Epub 2014 Mar 16.

50-year trends in US socioeconomic inequalities in health: US-born Black and White Americans, 1959-2008.

Author information

1
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA and Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu.
2
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA and Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Debates exist over whether health inequities are bound to rise as population health improves, due to health improving more quickly among the better off, with most analyses focused on mortality data.

METHODS:

We analysed 50 years of socioeconomic inequities in measured health status among US-born Black and White Americans, using data from the National Health Examination Surveys (NHES) I-III (1959-70), National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) I-III (1971-94) and NHANES 1999-2008.

RESULTS:

Absolute US socioeconomic health inequities for income percentile and education variously decreased (serum cholesterol; childhood height), stagnated [systolic blood pressure (SBP)], widened [body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC)] and in some cases reversed (age at menarche), even as on-average values rose (BMI, WC), idled (childhood height) and fell (SBP, serum cholesterol, age at menarche), with patterns often varying by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic measure; similar results occurred for relative inequities. For example, for WC, the adverse 20th (low) vs 80th (high) income percentile gap increased only among Whites (NHES I: 0.71 cm [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.74, 2.16); NHANES 2005-08: 2.10 (95% CI 0.96, 3.62)]. By contrast, age at menarche for girls in the 20th vs 80th income percentile among Black girls remained consistently lower, by 0.34 years (95% CI 0.12, 0.55) whereas among White girls the initial null difference became inverse [NHANES 2005-08: -0.49 years (95% CI -0.86, -0.12; overall P = 0.0015)]. Adjusting for socioeconomic position only modestly altered Black/White health inequities.

CONCLUSIONS:

Health inequities need not rise as population health improves.

KEYWORDS:

National Health Examination Survey (NHES) - US; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) - US; Social inequalities in health; race/ethnicity; secular trend; socioeconomic

PMID:
24639440
PMCID:
PMC4121555
DOI:
10.1093/ije/dyu047
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center