Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jun;95(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

Summative assessment of undergraduates' communication competence in challenging doctor-patient encounters. Evaluation of the Düsseldorf CoMeD-OSCE.

Author information

1
Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany. Electronic address: achim.mortsiefer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
2
Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
3
Deanery of Study and Department for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
4
Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
5
Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the University of Rostock, Rostock 18057, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the summative assessment (OSCE) of a communication training programme for dealing with challenging doctor-patient encounters in the 4th study year.

METHODS:

Our OSCE consists of 4 stations (breaking bad news, guilt and shame, aggressive patients, shared decision making), using a 4-item global rating (GR) instrument. We calculated reliability coefficients for different levels, discriminability of single items and interrater reliability. Validity was estimated by gender differences and accordance between GR and a checklist.

RESULTS:

In a pooled sample of 456 students in 3 OSCEs over 3 terms, total reliability was α=0.64, reliability coefficients for single stations were >0.80, and discriminability in 3 of 4 stations was within the range of 0.4-0.7. Except for one station, interrater reliability was moderate to strong. Reliability on item level was poor and pointed to some problems with the use of the GR.

CONCLUSION:

The application of the GR on regular undergraduate medical education shows moderate reliability in need of improvement and some traits of validity. Ongoing development and evaluation is needed with particular regard to the training of the examiners.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS:

Our CoMeD-OSCE proved suitable for the summative assessment of communication skills in challenging doctor-patient encounters.

KEYWORDS:

Assessment; Communication skills; Feasibility; Global rating scale; Medical education; OSCE; Reliability; Validity

PMID:
24637164
DOI:
10.1016/j.pec.2014.02.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center