Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Semin Vasc Surg. 2013 Jun-Sep;26(2-3):67-71. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 22.

Interpretation pitfalls of vascular laboratory testing.

Author information

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, 7404 Medical Center Drive, Mail Code 7403, La Jolla, CA 92037. Electronic address:


Vascular laboratory testing of patients with arterial and venous disease requires a thorough understanding of the diagnostic instrumentation, anatomy, and blood flow hemodynamics. Diagnostic testing typically uses both Doppler ultrasound, especially duplex ultrasonography, alone or in combination with air plethysmography, to identify and classify vascular disease. In patients with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, clinical evaluation is enhanced by noninvasive testing, and for many patients can provide sufficient information to proceed with medical treatment or intervention without additional confirmatory imaging studies. The diagnostic accuracy of vascular testing depends on the precision and reproducibility of the measurement (eg, pressure, pulse contour, blood flow velocity, or volume flow rate). For example, the measurement of ankle systolic blood pressure cannot always be assumed to be accurate because the test result can be affected by a number of factors, including biological variability, cuff size and placement, examiner skill, or the presence of tibial artery calcification preventing cuff occlusion. Interpretation of all vascular diagnostic testing requires an appreciation of the limitations, pitfalls, and artifacts of the testing modality. Interpretation errors can result in an incorrect diagnosis and subsequent decision making.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center