Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014 Aug;9(2):97-100. doi: 10.1007/s11751-014-0191-1. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Preliminary experience with motorized distraction for tibial lengthening.

Author information

1
, 1950 Arlington Street, #111, Sarasota, FL, 34242, USA.

Abstract

Limb lengthening by callus distraction is commonly performed with the use of external fixation. Lengthening is routinely performed by the patient through small increments throughout the course of a day. Ilizarov has shown that both the rate and frequency of distraction are important factors in the quality of osteogenesis. We report the effect of motorized high frequency distraction for tibial lengthening in comparison with manual low-frequency distraction at the same rate. Manual distraction (0.25 mm four times a day) in a group containing 43 tibiae was compared with motorized distraction (1/1,440 mm 1,400 times a day) in a group containing 27 tibiae. There was no significant difference in time to union or in the incidence of complications.

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center