Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Nov;68(11):1012-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203516. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Validation of a population coronary disease predictive system: the CASSANDRA model.

Author information

1
Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
2
Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics Group, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
3
Docent and Research Unit of Family Medicine, IDIAP Jordi Gol (University Institute in Primary Care Research Jordi Gol), Girona, Spain Departament of Medicine, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
4
Cardiology Unit, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
5
Departament of Health, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
6
Department of Urology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The use of validated multivariate cardiovascular predictive models in a population setting is of interest for public health policy makers. We aimed to validate the estimations of the CASSANDRA model (coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence and CHD risk distribution), considering the population changes in age, sex and CHD risk factors prevalence in a 10-year period.

METHODS:

We compared the projected CHD incidence estimated with CASSANDRA with that observed in the Girona Heart Registry (REGICOR) for 1995-2004 and 2000-2009 in the population of Girona (Spain) aged 35-74 years. We used official age and sex distributions for this population. Baseline cardiovascular risk factors prevalence and the distribution of cardiovascular risk were obtained from three cross-sectional studies performed in 1995, 2000 and 2005. To validate the future distribution of cardiovascular risk, we tested the yearly CHD risk variance over the study period.

RESULTS:

No significant differences between the estimated and observed annual CHD incidence per 100 000 men were found in 1995-2004 (CASSANDRA=457.8 and REGICOR=420.3, incidence rate ratio (IRR) (95% CI)=0.92 (0.89 to 0.96)) and in 2000-2009 (441.4 and 409.6, respectively, IRR=0.93 (0.90 to 0.96)). However, overpredictions of 18% and 22%, respectively, were observed in women (198.8 and 160.4, IRR=0.82 (0.77 to 0.86), and 197.1 and 152.8, IRR=0.78 (0.74 to 0.83), respectively). No significant differences were found in the CHD risk variance in the three different cross-sectional studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

The CASSANDRA model produces valid estimates, particularly in men, of the future burden of disease and in the distribution of cardiovascular risk in individuals aged 35-74 years.

KEYWORDS:

Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Disease; Epidemiology; Health Planning; Risk Factors

PMID:
24619990
DOI:
10.1136/jech-2013-203516
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire
Loading ...
Support Center