Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Brief Bioinform. 2015 Mar;16(2):242-54. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbu004. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data.

Abstract

Somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) are an important type of structural variation affecting tumor pathogenesis. Accurate detection of genomic regions with SCNAs is crucial for cancer genomics as these regions contain likely drivers of cancer development. Deep sequencing technology provides single-nucleotide resolution genomic data and is considered one of the best measurement technologies to detect SCNAs. Although several algorithms have been developed to detect SCNAs from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data, their relative performance has not been studied. Here, we have compared ten SCNA detection algorithms in both simulated and primary tumor deep sequencing data. In addition, we have evaluated the applicability of exome sequencing data for SCNA detection. Our results show that (i) clear differences exist in sensitivity and specificity between the algorithms, (ii) SCNA detection algorithms are able to identify most of the complex chromosomal alterations and (iii) exome sequencing data are suitable for SCNA detection.

KEYWORDS:

Somatic copy number alterations; algorithm comparison; cancer; whole-exome sequencing; whole-genome sequencing

PMID:
24599115
DOI:
10.1093/bib/bbu004
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center