Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Apr;25:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Feb 25.

Bayesian inferences about the self (and others): a review.

Author information

1
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: fzsemmo@gn.apc.org.
2
Department of Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom.
3
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
4
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Viewing the brain as an organ of approximate Bayesian inference can help us understand how it represents the self. We suggest that inferred representations of the self have a normative function: to predict and optimise the likely outcomes of social interactions. Technically, we cast this predict-and-optimise as maximising the chance of favourable outcomes through active inference. Here the utility of outcomes can be conceptualised as prior beliefs about final states. Actions based on interpersonal representations can therefore be understood as minimising surprise - under the prior belief that one will end up in states with high utility. Interpersonal representations thus serve to render interactions more predictable, while the affective valence of interpersonal inference renders self-perception evaluative. Distortions of self-representation contribute to major psychiatric disorders such as depression, personality disorder and paranoia. The approach we review may therefore operationalise the study of interpersonal representations in pathological states.

KEYWORDS:

Active inference; Free energy minimisation; Other-representation; Paranoia; Personality disorder; Self-representation

PMID:
24583455
PMCID:
PMC3989044
DOI:
10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center