Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;104:201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.028. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Health inequalities in Japan: the role of material, psychosocial, social relational and behavioural factors.

Author information

1
Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. Electronic address: ayako.hiyoshi@orebroll.se.
2
Department of Community Health and Medicine, Yamaguchi University School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
3
Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The extent that risk factors, identified in Western countries, account for health inequalities in Japan remains unclear. We analysed a nationally representative sample (Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions surveyed in 2001 (n = 40,243)). The cross-sectional association between self-rated fair or poor health and household income and a theory-based occupational social class was summarised using the relative index of inequality [RII]. The percentage attenuation in RII accounted for by candidate contributory factors - material, psychosocial, social relational and behavioural - was computed. The results showed that the RII for household income based on self-rated fair or poor health was reduced after including the four candidate contributory factors in the model by 20% (95% CI 2.1, 43.6) and 44% (95% CI 18.2, 92.5) in men and women, respectively. The RII for the Japanese Socioeconomic Classification [J-SEC] was reduced, not significantly, by 22% (95% CI -6.3, 100.0) in men in the corresponding model, while J-SEC was not associated with self-rated health in women. Material factors produced the most consistent and strong attenuation in RII for both socioeconomic indicators, while the contributions attributable to behaviour alone were modest. Social relational factors consistently attenuated the RII for both socioeconomic indicators in men whereas they did not make an independent contribution in women. The influence of perceived stress was inconsistent and depended on the socioeconomic indicator used. In summary, social inequalities in self-rated fair or poor health were reduced to a degree by the factors included. The results indicate that the levelling of health across the socioeconomic hierarchy needs to consider a wide range of factors, including material and psychosocial factors, in addition to the behavioural factors upon which the current public health policies in Japan focus. The analyses in this study need to be replicated using a longitudinal study design to confirm the roles of different factors in health inequalities.

KEYWORDS:

Health inequalities; Income; Japan; Self-rated health; Social class; Socioeconomic

PMID:
24581079
DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.028
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center