Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Med. 2014 Jun;127(6):538-46. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 18.

Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction.

Author information

1
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Electronic address: dunlay.shannon@mayo.edu.
2
Division of Cardiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass.
3
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
4
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
5
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Participation in cardiac rehabilitation has been shown to decrease mortality after acute myocardial infarction, but its impact on readmissions requires examination.

METHODS:

We conducted a population-based surveillance study of residents discharged from the hospital after their first-ever myocardial infarction in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1, 1987, to September 30, 2010. Patients were followed up through December 31, 2010. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction was determined using billing data. We used a landmark analysis approach (cardiac rehabilitation participant vs not determined by attendance in at least 1 session of cardiac rehabilitation at 90 days post-myocardial infarction discharge) to compare readmission and mortality risk between cardiac rehabilitation participants and nonparticipants accounting for propensity to participate using inverse probability treatment weighting.

RESULTS:

Of 2991 patients with incident myocardial infarction, 1569 (52.5%) participated in cardiac rehabilitation after hospital discharge. The cardiac rehabilitation participation rate did not change during the study period, but increased in the elderly and decreased in men and younger patients. After adjustment, cardiac rehabilitation participants had lower all-cause readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.87; P < .001), cardiovascular readmission (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99; P = .037), noncardiovascular readmission (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.85; P < .001), and mortality (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.49-0.68; P < .001) risk.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cardiac rehabilitation participation is associated with a markedly reduced risk of readmission and death after incident myocardial infarction. Improving cardiac rehabilitation participation rates may have a large impact on post-myocardial infarction healthcare resource use and outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

Cardiac rehabilitation; Epidemiology; Myocardial infarction; Readmission; Survival

PMID:
24556195
PMCID:
PMC4035431
DOI:
10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.008
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center