Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014 Jun;30(5):313-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361842. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

Living with a unilateral mastectomy defect: a utility assessment and outcomes study.

Author information

1
Division of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
2
Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The gold standard for the treatment of breast cancer includes mastectomy surgery. Our goal was to quantify the health state utility assessment of living with unilateral mastectomy.

METHODS:

The visual analogue scale (VAS), time trade-off (TTO), and standard gamble (SG) were used to obtain utilities for unilateral mastectomy, monocular blindness and binocular blindness from a prospective sample of the general population and medical students.

RESULTS:

All measures (VAS, TTO, SG) for unilateral mastectomy (0.75 SD 0.17, 0.87 SD 0.14, and 0.86 SD 0.18, respectively) of the 140 volunteers were significantly different from the corresponding scores for monocular (0.61 SD 0.18, 0.84 SD 0.17, and 0.84 SD 0.18, respectively) and binocular blindness (0.38 SD 0.17, 0.67 SD 0.24, and 0.69 SD 0.23, respectively). Age, gender, race, education, and income were not statistically significant independent predictors of utility scores.

CONCLUSION:

In a sample of the general population and medical students, utility assessments for living with unilateral mastectomy were comparable with those of living with bilateral mastectomy and severe breast hypertrophy. Our sample population, if faced living with unilateral mastectomy was willing to gamble a theoretical 14% chance of death and willing to trade 4.2 years of existing life-years.

PMID:
24535675
DOI:
10.1055/s-0033-1361842
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
Loading ...
Support Center