Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1715-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Lone atrial fibrillation: does it exist?

Author information

1
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta/University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: dgwyse@ucalgary.ca.
2
Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
3
Cardiac Arrhythmia Service and Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
4
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.
5
Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
6
University of California and Veterans' Affairs Medical Centers, San Diego, California.
7
Department of Medicine and Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8
Department of Physiology, University Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Abstract

The historical origin of the term "lone atrial fibrillation" (AF) predates by 60 years our current understanding of the pathophysiology of AF, the multitude of known etiologies for AF, and our ability to image and diagnose heart disease. The term was meant to indicate AF in patients for whom subsequent investigations could not demonstrate heart disease, but for many practitioners has become synonymous with "idiopathic AF." As the list of heart diseases has expanded and diagnostic techniques have improved, the prevalence of lone AF has fallen. The legacy of the intervening years is that definitions of lone AF in the literature are inconsistent so that studies of lone AF are not comparable. Guidelines provide a vague definition of lone AF but do not provide direction about how much or what kind of imaging and other testing are necessary to exclude heart disease. There has been an explosion in the understanding of the pathophysiology of AF in the last 20 years in particular. Nevertheless, there are no apparently unique mechanisms for AF in patients categorized as having lone AF. In addition, the term "lone AF" is not invariably useful in making treatment decisions, and other tools for doing so have been more thoroughly and carefully validated. It is, therefore, recommended that use of the term "lone AF" be avoided.

KEYWORDS:

idiopathic atrial fibrillation; lone atrial fibrillation; white paper

PMID:
24530673
PMCID:
PMC4008692
DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center