Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Clin Pathol. 2014 Mar;141(3):367-73. doi: 10.1309/AJCPCYWVL61SVKFU.

Impact of p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry staining on interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Author information

1
Servizio Interaziendale di Epidemiologia, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy; paolo.giorgirossi@ausl.re.it.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to compare the interobserver Cohen κ on H&E staining and on H&E plus p16(INK4a) staining of all cervical biopsy specimens in a population-based screening program.

METHODS:

All the colposcopy-guided biopsies generated by the routine screening of 23,258 women aged 25 to 64 years were stained with H&E and H&E plus p16. Biopsy specimens were reviewed by six external experts.

RESULTS:

The four diagnoses were available in 441 cases. The interobserver κ values were 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.58) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.42-0.56) with H&E and H&E + p16, respectively, when using a five-group classification (normal, CIN 1, CIN 2, CIN 3, and cancer); adopting a two-group classification (≤CIN 1 and ≥CIN 2), the values were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of p16 on all cervical biopsy specimens in a screening program showed virtually no effect on reproducibility of the histologic diagnosis.

KEYWORDS:

Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Immunohistochemistry; Mass screening; Reproducibility; p16 protein/p16INK4a (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor)

PMID:
24515764
DOI:
10.1309/AJCPCYWVL61SVKFU
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center