Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Feb 8.

Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply?

Author information

1
Departments of Urology, Radiology, Pathology and Biomedical Engineering, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
2
Departments of Urology, Radiology, Pathology and Biomedical Engineering, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: lmarks@mednet.ucla.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Established in 1994, the Epstein histological criteria (Gleason score 6 or less, 2 or fewer cores positive and 50% or less of any core) have been widely used to select men for active surveillance. However, with the advent of targeted biopsy, which may be more accurate than conventional biopsy, we reevaluated the likelihood of reclassification upon confirmatory rebiopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We identified 113 men enrolled in active surveillance at our institution who met Epstein criteria and subsequently underwent confirmatory targeted biopsy via multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion. Median patient age was 64 years, median prostate specific antigen was 4.2 ng/ml and median prostate volume was 46.8 cc. Targets or regions of interest on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion were graded by suspicion level and biopsied at 3 mm intervals along the longest axis (median 10.5 mm). Also, 12 systematic cores were obtained during confirmatory rebiopsy. Our reporting is consistent with START (Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies) criteria.

RESULTS:

Confirmatory fusion biopsy resulted in reclassification in 41 men (36%), including 26 (23%) due to Gleason grade 6 or greater and 15 (13%) due to high volume Gleason 6 disease. When stratified by suspicion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion, the likelihood of reclassification was 24% to 29% for target grade 0 to 3, 45% for grade 4 and 100% for grade 5 (p=0.001). Men with grade 4 and 5 vs lower grade targets were greater than 3 times more likely to be reclassified (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.1, p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS:

Upon confirmatory rebiopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion men with high suspicion targets on imaging were reclassified 45% to 100% of the time. Criteria for active surveillance should be reevaluated when multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy is used.

KEYWORDS:

magnetic resonance imaging; patient selection; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

PMID:
24512956
PMCID:
PMC4129939
DOI:
10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.005
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center