Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

Safety of physical therapy interventions in critically ill patients: a single-center prospective evaluation of 1110 intensive care unit admissions.

Author information

1
Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
2
Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
3
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
4
Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: dale.needham@jhmi.edu.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Critical illness survivors commonly have impaired physical functioning. Physical therapy interventions delivered in the intensive care unit can reduce these impairments, but the safety of such interventions within routine clinical practice requires greater investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We conducted a prospective observational study of routine physical therapy from July 2009 through December 2011 in the Johns Hopkins Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit in Baltimore, MD. The incidence of 12 types of physiological abnormalities and potential safety events associated with physical therapy were monitored and evaluated for any additional treatment, cost, or length of stay.

RESULTS:

Of 1787 admissions of at least 24 hours, 1110 (62%) participated in 5267 physical therapy sessions conducted by 10 different physical therapists on 4580 patient-days. A total of 34 (0.6%) sessions had a physiological abnormality or potential safety event, with the most common being arrhythmia (10 occurrences, 0.2%) and mean arterial pressure greater than 140 mm Hg (8 occurrences; 0.2%) and less than 55 mm Hg (5 occurrences; 0.1%). Only 4 occurrences (0.1%) required minimal additional treatment or cost, without additional length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this large, single-center study, routine care physical therapy interventions were safe for critically ill patients.

KEYWORDS:

Critical illness; Intensive care unit; Physical therapy modalities; Rehabilitation; Safety

PMID:
24508202
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.12.012
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center