Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Apr;23(2):163-72. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000698. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

Neuroethics, painience, and neurocentric criteria for the moral treatment of animals.

Abstract

Neuroscience affords knowledge that can be leveraged in the ontological valuation of individuals, groups, and species. Sociocultural sentiments, norms, and mores may impede embracing such knowledge to revise moral attitudes, ethics, and policies. We argue that the practices of neuroethics will be valuable in that they ground ethico-legal discourse in (1) naturalistic philosophy; (2) the current epistemological capital of neuroscience; (3) the issues, problems, and solutions arising in and from neuroscientific research and its applications; and 4) the use of neurocentric criteria-such as painience-to define and resolve ethical decisions regarding attitudes toward and treatment of nonhuman animals.

PMID:
24495713
DOI:
10.1017/S0963180113000698
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Cambridge University Press
    Loading ...
    Support Center