Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jan 29;20:147-52. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890239.

A comparison of the effects of methylprednisolone and tenoxicam on pain, edema, and trismus after impacted lower third molar extraction.

Author information

1
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral and Dental Health Center, Mersin, Turkey.
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Dicle, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of preemptive intravenous tenoxicam and methylprednisolone administrations on extraction of impacted third molars.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. A total of 60 adult patients ages 18-40 years with the complaints of impacted third molar teeth were included in the study.

RESULTS:

The postoperative swelling ratios (p<0.05) and pain scores (p<0.05) were significantly better in both study groups than in the control group and there was no statistically significant difference between methylprednisolone and tenoxicam groups with regards to the edema and pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preoperative administration of 80 mg methylprednisolone achieves better control of trismus than tenoxicam without any significant differences in edema and pain control in impacted third molar teeth extraction.

PMID:
24473372
PMCID:
PMC3915002
DOI:
10.12659/MSM.890239
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for International Scientific Literature, Ltd. Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center