Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Light Res Technol. 2013 Aug;45(4):421-434.

Comparisons of three practical field devices used to measure personal light exposures and activity levels.

Author information

1
Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 21 Union Street, Troy, NY 12180.

Abstract

This paper documents the spectral and spatial performance characteristics of two new versions of the Daysimeter, devices developed and calibrated by the Lighting Research Center to measure and record personal circadian light exposure and activity levels, and compares them to those of the Actiwatch Spectrum (Philips Healthcare). Photometric errors from the Daysimeters and the Actiwatch Spectrum were also determined for various types of light sources. The Daysimeters had better photometric performance than the Actiwatch Spectrum. To assess differences associated with measuring light and activity levels at different locations on the body, older adults wore four Daysimeters and an Actiwatch Spectrum for five consecutive days. Wearing the Daysimeter or Actiwatch Spectrum on the wrist compromises accurate light measurements relative to locating a calibrated photosensor at the plane of the cornea.

KEYWORDS:

circadian system; light exposure; photometric devices; rest/activity patterns

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center