Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Mar;99(3):800-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2824. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

Glycemic control and all-cause mortality risk in type 1 diabetes patients: the EURODIAB prospective complications study.

Author information

1
School of Population Health (D.A.J.M.S.), University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4006 Queensland, Australia; Department of Diabetes, la PitiƩ Hospital and University Pierre et Marie Curie, 75013 Paris, France; INSERM CESP (D.S.), U-1018, 94805 Villejuif, France; National Heart and Lung Institute (N.C.), Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health (J.H.F.), University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; and Division of Human Nutrition (S.S.S.-M.), Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Glycemic targets and the benefit of intensive glucose control are currently under debate because intensive glycemic control has been suggested to have negative effects on mortality risk in type 2 diabetes patients.

OBJECTIVE:

We examined the association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and all-cause mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS:

A clinic-based prospective cohort study was performed in 2764 European patients with type 1 diabetes aged 15-60 years enrolled in the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study.

OUTCOME MEASURE:

Possible nonlinearity of the association between HbA1c and all-cause mortality was examined using multivariable restricted cubic spline regression using three (at HbA1c 5.6%, 8.1%, and 11.8%) and five knots (additionally at HbA1c 7.1% and 9.5%). Mortality data were collected approximately 7 years after baseline examination.

RESULTS:

HbA1c was related to all-cause mortality in a nonlinear manner after adjustment for age and sex. All-cause mortality risk was increased at both low (5.6%) and high (11.8%) HbA1c compared with the reference (median HbA1c: 8.1%) following a U-shaped association [P overall effect = .008 and .04, P nonlinearity = .03 and .11 (three and five knots, respectively)].

CONCLUSIONS:

Results from our study in type 1 diabetes patients suggest that target HbA1c below a certain threshold may not be appropriate in this population. We recognize that these low HbA1c levels may be related to anemia, renal insufficiency, infection, or other factors not available in our database. If our data are confirmed, the potential mechanisms underlying this increased mortality risk among those with low HbA1c will need further study.

Comment in

PMID:
24423327
DOI:
10.1210/jc.2013-2824
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center