Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e83875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083875. eCollection 2014.

The Personalized Advantage Index: translating research on prediction into individualized treatment recommendations. A demonstration.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
2
Department of Psychiatry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
3
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Advances in personalized medicine require the identification of variables that predict differential response to treatments as well as the development and refinement of methods to transform predictive information into actionable recommendations.

OBJECTIVE:

To illustrate and test a new method for integrating predictive information to aid in treatment selection, using data from a randomized treatment comparison.

METHOD:

Data from a trial of antidepressant medications (N = 104) versus cognitive behavioral therapy (N = 50) for Major Depressive Disorder were used to produce predictions of post-treatment scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) in each of the two treatments for each of the 154 patients. The patient's own data were not used in the models that yielded these predictions. Five pre-randomization variables that predicted differential response (marital status, employment status, life events, comorbid personality disorder, and prior medication trials) were included in regression models, permitting the calculation of each patient's Personalized Advantage Index (PAI), in HRSD units.

RESULTS:

For 60% of the sample a clinically meaningful advantage (PAI≥3) was predicted for one of the treatments, relative to the other. When these patients were divided into those randomly assigned to their "Optimal" treatment versus those assigned to their "Non-optimal" treatment, outcomes in the former group were superior (d = 0.58, 95% CI .17-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

This approach to treatment selection, implemented in the context of two equally effective treatments, yielded effects that, if obtained prospectively, would rival those routinely observed in comparisons of active versus control treatments.

PMID:
24416178
PMCID:
PMC3885521
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0083875
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center