Send to

Choose Destination
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):176-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.

Author information

Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address:
Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Oxford Centre for Neuroethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Health Research Authority, London, UK.
James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK.


After identification of an important research question and selection of an appropriate study design, waste can arise from the regulation, governance, and management of biomedical research. Obtaining regulatory and governance approval has become increasingly burdensome and disproportionate to the conceivable risks to research participants. Regulation and governance involve interventions that are assumed to be justified in the interests of patients and the public, but they can actually compromise these interests. Inefficient management of the procedural conduct of research is wasteful, especially if it results in poor recruitment and retention of participants in well designed studies addressing important questions. These sources of waste can be minimised if the following four recommendations are addressed. First, regulators should use their influence to reduce other causes of waste and inefficiency in research. Second, regulators and policy makers should work with researchers, patients, and health professionals to streamline and harmonise the laws, regulations, guidelines, and processes that govern whether and how research can be done, and ensure that they are proportionate to the plausible risks associated with the research. Third, researchers and research managers should increase the efficiency of recruitment, retention, data monitoring, and data sharing in research through use of research designs known to reduce inefficiencies, and further research should be done to learn how efficiency can be increased. Finally, everyone, particularly those responsible for health-care systems, should promote integration of research into everyday clinical practice. Regulators and researchers should monitor adherence to each of these recommendations and publish metrics.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center