Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Jan 1;92(1):20-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.116806. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt.

Author information

1
Health Policy PhD Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada .
2
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada .
3
McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada .
4
Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon .
5
Departamento Medicina Familiar, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile .

Abstract

in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian, Spanish

OBJECTIVE:

To develop and implement a method for the evaluation of "evidence briefs" and "deliberative dialogues" that could be applied to comparative studies of similar strategies used in the support of evidence-informed policy-making.

METHODS:

Participants who read evidence briefs and attended deliberative dialogues in Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Nigeria, Uganda and Zambia were surveyed before the start of the dialogues - to collect their views on pre-circulated evidence briefs - and at the end of the dialogues - to collect their views on the dialogues. The respondents' assessments of the briefs and dialogues and the respondents' intentions to act on what they had learned were then investigated in descriptive statistical analyses and regression models.

FINDINGS:

Of the 530 individuals who read the evidence briefs and attended dialogues, 304 (57%) and 303 (57%) completed questionnaires about the briefs and dialogues, respectively. Respondents viewed the evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues - as well as each of their key features - very favourably, regardless of the country, issue or group involved. Overall, "not concluding with recommendations" and "not aiming for a consensus" were identified as the least helpful features of the briefs and dialogues, respectively. Respondents generally reported strong intentions to act on what they had learnt.

CONCLUSION:

Although some aspects of their design may need to be improved or, at least, explained and justified to policy-makers and stakeholders, evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues appear to be highly regarded and to lead to intentions to act.

PMID:
24391297
PMCID:
PMC3865546
DOI:
10.2471/BLT.12.116806
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center