Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jan 21;110(2):375-83. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.743. Epub 2013 Dec 24.

Detection and prognostic significance of circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer according to immunohistochemical subtypes.

Author information

1
1] Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncology Centre GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Oosterveldlaan 24, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium [2] Department of Oncology, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
2
Translational Cancer Research Unit, Oncology Centre GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Oosterveldlaan 24, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
3
Department of Oncology, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.
4
Department of Pathology, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The enumeration of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) with the EpCAM-based CellSearch system has prognostic significance in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The aim of this study was to explore potential differences in the detection and prognostic significance of CTCs in MBC according to immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer.

METHODS:

CellSearch CTC counts were obtained from 154 MBC patients before first-line systemic treatment between November 2007 and August 2012. Patients were categorised in five subgroups according to immunohistochemical surrogate definitions of intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer based on hormone receptor status, HER2/neu status and histological grade. Differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed relative to the cut-off value of ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood.

RESULTS:

No significant differences were observed in the absolute CTC counts (P=0.120) or in CTC positivity rates according to ≥1 and ≥5 CTCs per 7.5 ml blood detection thresholds (P=0.165 and P=0.651, respectively) between immunohistochemical subtypes. However, very high CTC counts, defined as ≥80 CTCs per 7.5 ml, were observed more frequently in patients with Luminal A and triple negative (TN) breast cancer (P=0.024). In the total study population, the presence of ≥5 CTCs was the single most significant prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (P<0.001). A more limited prognostic impact, not reaching statistical significance, was observed in patients with HER2-positive disease as opposed to patients with Luminal A, Luminal B-HER2-negative and TN disease.

CONCLUSION:

The detection of EpCAM+CTCs was not clearly associated with any of the immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer in patients with MBC before first-line treatment. Potentially clinically relevant differences were however observed at very high CTC counts. Furthermore, our data suggest a lower prognostic significance of CTC evaluation in HER2-positive patients with MBC.

PMID:
24366294
PMCID:
PMC3899770
DOI:
10.1038/bjc.2013.743
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center