Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.007.

Drug-eluting stents for revascularization of infrapopliteal arteries: updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Author information

1
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany.
2
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: cassese@dhm.mhn.de.
3
Radiologische Klinik, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Karls-Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
4
Klinische Abteilung für Kardiologie, Universität Graz, Graz, Austria.
5
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany; DZHK-German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to undertake an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating the outcomes of percutaneous revascularization with primary drug-eluting stenting in patients with atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries.

BACKGROUND:

In atherosclerotic disease of infrapopliteal arteries, drug-eluting stents (DESs) improve patency rates compared with plain balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stents (BMSs). However, the clinical impact of DES placement in this vascular territory still remains uncertain.

METHODS:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), scientific session abstracts, and relevant Websites. The keywords used were "below the knee," "infrapopliteal artery," "angioplasty," "drug-eluting stent(s)," "bare metal stent(s)," "trial," and "randomized trial." Inclusion criteria were randomized design, intention-to-treat analysis, and a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Exclusion criteria were vessels treated other than infrapopliteal arteries; devices used other than DESs, plain balloons, or BMSs; and duplicated data. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization; secondary endpoints were restenosis, amputation, death, and improvement in Rutherford class.

RESULTS:

A total of 611 patients from 5 trials were randomly assigned to DESs (n = 294) versus control therapy (plain balloon angioplasty/BMS implantation, n = 307). Overall, the median lesion length was 26.8 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 18.2 to 30.0 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of 2.86 mm (IQR: 2.68 to 3.00 mm). At a median follow-up of 12 months (IQR: 12 to 36 months), DESs reduced the risk of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio [OR]: 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18 to 0.54; p < 0.001), restenosis (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.43; p < 0.001), and amputation (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.97); p = 0.04) without a significant difference in terms of death (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.49; p = 0.50) and Rutherford class improvement (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91 to 2.04; p = 0.13) versus control therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

In focal disease of infrapopliteal arteries, DES therapy reduces the risk of reintervention and amputation compared with plain balloon angioplasty or BMS implantation without any impact on mortality and Rutherford class at 1-year follow-up.

KEYWORDS:

ARR; BMS; CI; CLI; DAPT; DES; IQR; NNT; OR; RC; Rutherford class; TLR; absolute risk reduction; bare-metal stent(s); confidence interval; critical limb ischemia; drug-eluting stent(s); dual antiplatelet therapy; infrapopliteal artery; interquartile range; meta-analysis; number needed to treat; odds ratio; plain angioplasty; target lesion revascularization

Comment in

PMID:
24355118
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.007
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center