Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Apr;11(4):549-56. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.025. Epub 2013 Dec 14.

Pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of pulmonary venous anatomy on long-term outcome of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Author information

1
Alfred Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
2
Alfred Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
3
Alfred Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
4
Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
5
Alfred Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Melbourne Private Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: peter.kistler@bakeridi.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, PV reconnection remains problematic.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of PV anatomy on outcome after AF ablation.

METHODS:

One hundred two patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (60%) or computed tomography (40%) before AF ablation. PV anatomy was classified according to the presence of common PVs, accessory PVs, PV branching pattern, and the dimensions of the PV ostia, intervenous ridges (IVRs), and the left PV-left atrial appendage ridge.

RESULTS:

Four discrete PVs were present in 48(47%) of the patients: a left common PV in 38(37%), a right common PV in 2(2%), an accessory right PV in 20(20%), and left PV in 4(4%). At a mean follow-up of 12 ± 4 months, 75 of 102 (74%) patients were free of recurrent AF. A LCPV was associated with an increase in freedom from AF (87% vs 66% for 4 PV anatomy; P = .03). Greater left IVR length (16.9 ± 3.5 mm vs 14.0 ± 3.0 mm; P ≤ .001) and width (1.4 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.1 ± 0.6 mm; P = .02) were associated with increased AF recurrence. After multivariate analysis, abnormal anatomy (LCPV or accessory PV) and left IVR length were found to be the only independent predictors of freedom from AF.

CONCLUSIONS:

Four discrete PVs are present in the minority of patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PV isolation. The presence of a LCPV is associated with an increased freedom from AF after catheter ablation. PV anatomy may in part explain the variable outcome to electrical isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF.

KEYWORDS:

Ablation; Anatomy; Atrial fibrillation; Intervenous ridge; Pulmonary vein isolation

Comment in

PMID:
24342795
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.025
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center