Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):808-15. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2424-x. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

Circular vs. three-quadrant hemorrhoidectomy for end-stage hemorrhoids: short- and long-term outcomes of a prospective randomized trial.

Author information

1
Coloproctological Center of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia, proctological_centre@gol.ge.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Circumferential excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH) enables the surgeon to remove the encircling hemorrhoids completely. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of CEH with that of Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy (FH) for end-stage hemorrhoids.

METHODS:

Between February 1998 and December 2011, a prospective randomized trial was conducted with 688 patients who presented with end-stage hemorrhoids and underwent FH or CEH at our center.

RESULTS:

The patient demographics, mean operative times, lengths of hospital stay, and cumulative rates of postoperative complications were similar in the study groups. Significant differences were revealed in the incidence of postoperative hemorrhage (9 vs. 0 patients in the FH and CEH groups, respectively; pā€‰=ā€‰0.002) and in the tendency to form anal stricture (15 vs. 32 patients in the FH and CEH groups, respectively; pā€‰=ā€‰0.02). However, all cases of anal strictures were easily managed by digital dilatations. At a mean follow-up of 7.4 (range, 1-14) years, accessible patients from the CEH group remained symptom free, whereas 126 of 308 patients in the FH group indicated that they had recurrent hemorrhoidal symptoms.

CONCLUSION:

Without increasing postoperative complications, CEH demonstrates an advantage compared with FH, with regard to reducing the rate of recurrence to 0 through complete hemorrhoid removal.

PMID:
24297654
DOI:
10.1007/s11605-013-2424-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center