Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1199-213. doi: 10.1037/a0035177. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

The politics of the face-in-the-crowd.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
2
Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Abstract

Recent work indicates that the more conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on negative stimuli, whereas the less conservative one is, the faster one is to fixate on positive stimuli. The present series of experiments used the face-in-the-crowd paradigm to examine whether variability in the efficiency with which positive and negative stimuli are detected underlies such speed differences. Participants searched for a discrepant facial expression (happy or angry) amid a varying number of neutral distractors (Experiments 1 and 4). A combination of response time and eye movement analyses indicated that variability in search efficiency explained speed differences for happy expressions, whereas variability in post-selectional processes explained speed differences for angry expressions. These results appear to be emotionally mediated as search performance did not vary with political temperament when displays were inverted (Experiment 2) or when controlled processing was required for successful task performance (Experiment 3). Taken together, the present results suggest political temperament is at least partially instantiated by attentional biases for emotional material.

PMID:
24294865
DOI:
10.1037/a0035177
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center