Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Feb;36(1):112-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9862-0. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

Adherence to inhaled corticosteroids by asthmatic patients: measurement and modelling.

Author information

1
Division for Social Research in Medicines and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is known as the main cause for therapeutic failure in asthma treatment and associated morbidity. To improve adherence, targetted and effective interventions need to be developed ideally based on using longitudinal follow-up of a large study cohort to establish patterns and influences on adherence.

OBJECTIVE:

To develop an annual measure of asthma patients' adherence to ICS using primary care prescribing data over consecutive annual intervals, and to statistically model ICS adherence controlling for a range of patient factors.

SETTING:

A retrospective cohort study between 1997 and 2010 using United Kingdom general practice prescribing data on asthma patients aged between 12 and 65 years, without a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

METHOD:

Patient's ICS prescriptions are used to calculate the 'number of days prescribed during calendar year' divided by 'number of days in the interval' to form an annual prescription possession ratio (PPR) for each patient. Several definitions of PPR are considered and compared when calculating numerator and denominator. Adherence, measured by the preferred PPR, is then modelled to estimate the effect of asthma exacerbation, severity, control and other patient factors on adherence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:

PPR, being a proxy measure for adherence.

RESULTS:

Annual PPR by all strategies gave a similar frequency profile. ICS were either over- or under-prescribed for over half of the follow-up time. Adherence was lower in younger patients, those newer to the study timeframe, those with less severe asthma, those with good control, with lower previous adherence, and who had not previously experienced an exacerbation.

CONCLUSION:

The chosen PPR simulated clinical use of ICS most closely; including overlapping days, excess days passed to the next interval, considering gaps in the denominator, with censoring at 100 %. The PPR is a useful measure for signalling or measuring adherence changes over time. The modelling results identified many characteristics which would indicate which asthma patients and at what points in their treatment cycle they would be at increased risk of low adherence.

PMID:
24293333
PMCID:
PMC3885804
DOI:
10.1007/s11096-013-9862-0
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center