Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1844-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.029. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and the in-hospital patient outcomes in the United States from 2000 to 2009.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 E. 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan. Electronic address: hiroyoshihara55@yahoo.co.jp.
2
Department of Statistical Sciences, School of Advanced Sciences, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 10-3 Midori-cho, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8562, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT:

Surgical treatment for spinal metastasis is still controversial. However, with the improvements in treatment for primary tumors, the survival rate of patients with spinal metastasis is enhanced. At the same time, surgical technique for spinal metastasis has also improved.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to examine trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and in-hospital patient outcomes on a national level.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING:

This was an epidemiologic study using national administrative data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

PATIENT SAMPLE:

All discharges in the NIS with a diagnosis code of secondary malignant neoplasm of the spinal cord/brain, meninges, or bone who also underwent spinal surgery from 2000 to 2009 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES:

Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis, in-hospital complications and mortality, and resource use were analyzed.

METHODS:

The NIS was used to identify patients who underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastasis from 2000 to 2009, using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, Clinical Modification codes. Trends in the surgical treatment for spinal metastasis and in-hospital patient outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS:

From 2000 to 2009, there was an increasing trend in the population growth-adjusted rate of surgical treatment for spinal metastasis (1.15-1.77 per 100,000; p<.001). Average Elixhauser comorbidity score increased over time (2.6-3.8; p<.001), and the overall in-hospital complication rate increased over time (14.8%-27.7%; p<.001), whereas in-hospital mortality rate and length of hospital stay remained stable over time (5.2%-4.6%, p=.413; 10.6-10.8 days, p=.626). Inflation-adjusted mean hospital charges increased more than two-fold over time ($50,390-$110,173; p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

During the last decade, surgical treatment for spinal metastasis has increased in the United States. The overall in-hospital complication rate and hospital charges increased, whereas the in-hospital mortality rate and length of hospital stay remained stable.

KEYWORDS:

Complication; Mortality; Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Spinal metastasis; Surgical treatment; Trend

PMID:
24291034
DOI:
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.029
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center