Transapical mitral valved stent implantation: comparison between circular and D-shaped design

EuroIntervention. 2014 Jul;10(3):372-80. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A63.

Abstract

Aims: In this study two designs of a self-expanding valved stent were compared after off-pump implantation into the mitral valve to identify the superior one.

Methods and results: Two designs of a mitral valved stent were tested. The first design is composed of a circular atrial element connected to a tube-shaped ventricular element. In the second design, the atrial element is D-shaped to achieve better anatomical alignment. Prior to in vivo testing, the area with the highest risk of PVL was identified in a hydrostatic in vitro set-up. Subsequently, eight pigs received stents (circular, n=5; D-shaped, n=3) via apical access in the beating heart. Positioning and haemodynamics were evaluated by TEE and invasive pressure measurement pre-implantation, after 1 hr, and at two and four weeks. In vitro testing showed less PVL in the anteromedial region in D-shaped design stents (p<0.001). All stents were successfully deployed in vivo and six animals maintained normal haemodynamics for two weeks or longer. Rotational reorientation of all stents with D-shaped elements was observed. Both groups indicated no clinically relevant gradients over the mitral valved stent.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the circular design was superior to the D-shaped model after rotational reorientation of the latter occurred.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Video-Audio Media

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Echocardiography, Transesophageal
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis*
  • Hemodynamics
  • Materials Testing
  • Mitral Valve / diagnostic imaging
  • Mitral Valve / physiopathology
  • Mitral Valve / surgery*
  • Models, Animal
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Swine
  • Time Factors