Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):176-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002133. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

Within-day and weekly variations of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: results from safe implementation of treatments in stroke-international stroke thrombolysis register.

Author information

1
From the Emergency Department Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy (S.L., D.T.); Karolinska Stroke Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (N.A., N.W.); Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland (T.T.); Acute Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Universitari Germas Trias i Pujol, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain (M.G., A.D.); International Clinical Research Center, Neurology Department, St. Anne's Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic (R.M.); Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Plzen, Czech Republic (P.S.); and Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland (J.O.).

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:

Temporal variations of thrombolysis delivery and their influence on outcome have been reported with controversial results. In this large cohort study, we evaluated whether thrombolytic treatment has a within-day and weekly variability corresponding to circadian and weekly patterns of ischemic stroke onset, and whether these have impact on clinical outcome.

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous alteplase, prospectively included in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register. Patients were grouped by treatment on day hours (08:00-19:59) or night hours (20:00-07:59) and treatment on weekdays and weekends. For each subgroup, we analyzed frequency of thrombolytic treatments, time intervals, and outcomes (3-month modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 as good functional outcome, mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage).

RESULTS:

We included 21 513 patients. Considering the mean expected number of patients treated per hour (0.4) and per day of the week (9.8), if no temporal variations were present, patients were significantly treated more during day hours and weekdays (P<0.0001). Median door-to-needle and onset-to-treatment times were longer for patients treated during night hours and on weekends (P<0.01). After adjustment for confounding variables, treatment during day hours was an independent predictor of good functional outcome (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.21; P=0.004), and patients treated during weekdays were at risk of higher mortality (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.28; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

Frequency of thrombolytic treatment seems to follow the same circadian pattern of stroke incidence, whereas its correspondence to a weekly pattern is less clear. Time of treatment is an independent predictor of outcome.

KEYWORDS:

circadian rhythm; outcome assessment; stroke; thrombolytic therapy; tissue-type plasminogen activator

PMID:
24262329
DOI:
10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002133
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center