Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):125-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963.

Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Author information

1
Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
2
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle.
3
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire.
4
General Internal Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs, San Francisco, California5Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
5
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
6
Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington9Department of Radiology, University of Vermont, Burlington.
7
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE:

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for breast cancer screening, diagnostic evaluation, and surveillance. However, we lack data on national patterns of breast MRI use in community practice.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe patterns of breast MRI use in US community practice during the period 2005 through 2009.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

Observational cohort study using data collected from 2005 through 2009 on breast MRI and mammography from 5 national Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries. Data included 8931 breast MRI examinations and 1,288,924 screening mammograms from women aged 18 to 79 years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

We calculated the rate of breast MRI examinations per 1000 women with breast imaging within the same year and described the clinical indications for the breast MRI examinations by year and age. We compared women screened with breast MRI to women screened with mammography alone for patient characteristics and lifetime breast cancer risk.

RESULTS:

The overall rate of breast MRI from 2005 through 2009 nearly tripled from 4.2 to 11.5 examinations per 1000 women, with the most rapid increase from 2005 to 2007 (P = .02). The most common clinical indication was diagnostic evaluation (40.3%), followed by screening (31.7%). Compared with women who received screening mammography alone, women who underwent screening breast MRI were more likely to be younger than 50 years, white non-Hispanic, and nulliparous and to have a personal history of breast cancer, a family history of breast cancer, and extremely dense breast tissue (all P < .001). The proportion of women screened using breast MRI at high lifetime risk for breast cancer (>20%) increased during the study period from 9% in 2005 to 29% in 2009.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

Use of breast MRI for screening in high-risk women is increasing. However, our findings suggest that there is a need to improve appropriate use, including among women who may benefit from screening breast MRI.

PMID:
24247555
PMCID:
PMC3905972
DOI:
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11963
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center