Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Feb;11(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

Phased RF ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation.

Author information

1
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: John.Hummel@osumc.edu.
2
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
3
Iowa Heart Center, Des Moines, Iowa.
4
Emory Crawford Long Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
5
Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas.
6
St. Luke's Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
7
Genesis Medical Center, Davenport, Iowa.
8
Piedmont Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
9
Austin Heart, Austin, Texas.
10
The John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
11
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) often requires extensive and/or repeat radiofrequency (RF) ablation procedures.

OBJECTIVE:

The Tailored Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (TTOP-AF) study assessed the effectiveness and safety of the phased RF system in a randomized controlled comparison of medical therapy against phased RF ablation for the management of persistent and long-standing persistent AF.

METHODS:

Patients who had failed at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) were randomized (2:1) to ablation management (AM) or medical management (MM). AM patients were allowed up to 2 ablations. Index and retreatment procedures consisted of pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms. MM patients received AAD changes and/or cardioversion. The primary end points of the TTOP-AF study included chronic effectiveness and safety at 6 months and acute safety within 7 days of ablation.

RESULTS:

At 6 months, a greater proportion of AM patients achieved effectiveness off AAD (77 of 138 [55.8%]) compared to MM patients (19 of 72 [26.4%]) (P < .0001). Acutely, 92.8% (128/138) of the procedures were successful while 12.3% (17/138) experienced a serious procedure and/or device-related adverse event. The predefined acute safety end point was not met. The proportion of patients with chronic safety events did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Catheter ablation of persistent/long-standing persistent AF with the phased RF ablation system is effective with greater reduction of AF compared with MM. More intense anticoagulation strategies, careful attention to catheter placement relative to the pulmonary vein ostia, and elimination of electrode interaction are expected to reduce the risk of stroke, pulmonary vein stenosis, and asymptomatic cerebral emboli.

KEYWORDS:

AAD; ACE; AF; AM; Ablation; Atrial fibrillation; CFAE; Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram; DCCV; FDA; Food and Drug Administration; INR; ITT; International normalized ratio; LA; LMWH; LVEF; MAAC; MASC; MM; OAT; PV; PVAC; Persistent; Phased RF; RF; SR; TEE; TTOP; TTOP-AF; Tailored Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; ablation management; antiarrhythmic drug; asymptomatic cerebral embolus; atrial fibrillation; direct current cardioversion; intention to treat; left atrial; left ventricular ejection fraction; low-molecular weight heparin; medical management; multiarray ablation catheter; multiarray septal catheter; oral anticoagulation therapy; pulmonary vein; pulmonary vein ablation catheter; radiofrequency; sinus rhythm; transesophageal echocardiography

PMID:
24239841
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.009
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center