Prevalence of visits to five types of complementary and alternative medicine practitioners by the general population: a systematic review

Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013 Nov;19(4):214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review surveys of 12-month prevalence of visits to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners for five therapies: acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, and medical herbalism.

Methods: Studies were identified via database searches to 2011. Study quality was assessed using a six-item tool.

Results: Forty-one surveys across 12 countries were included. Twenty-five (61%) met four of six quality criteria. Prevalence of visits by adults were (median, range): acupuncturists 1.4% (0.2-7.5%, N = 27 surveys), homeopaths 1.5% (0.2-2.9%, N = 20 surveys), osteopaths 1.9% (0.2-4.4%, N = 9 surveys), chiropractors 7.5% (0.3-16.7, N = 33 surveys), medical herbalists 0.9% (0.3-4.7%, N = 14 surveys). Estimates were slightly lower for children and higher for older adults. There was little change over the past 15-20 years.

Conclusions: This review summarises 12-month prevalence of visits to CAM practitioners in Europe, North America, Australia, East Asia, Saudi Arabia and Israel. A small but significant percentage of these general populations visit CAM practitioners each year.

Keywords: Acupuncture; Complementary therapies; Homeopathy; Prevalence; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Acupuncture Therapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Asia
  • Australia
  • Europe
  • Homeopathy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Manipulation, Chiropractic / statistics & numerical data*
  • Manipulation, Osteopathic / statistics & numerical data*
  • North America
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care*
  • Phytotherapy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prevalence