Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Feb;11(2):222-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.056. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Short- and long-term electrical performance of the 5086MRI pacing lead.

Author information

1
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: jrickar5@jhmi.edu.
2
Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
3
Mid Florida Cardiology, Orlando, Florida.
4
Iowa Heart Clinic, Des Moines, Iowa.
5
Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.
6
Medtronic Inc, Mounds View, Minnesota.
7
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Owing to potential patient harm, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices has traditionally been contraindicated. Following the EnRhythm MRI SureScan Study, an MR conditional pacemaker with modified leads was approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Electrical and handling characteristics of MR conditional pacing leads compared with those of traditional leads have not been established.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare short- and long-term performance of the Medtronic 5086MRI lead with that of the Medtronic 5076 lead.

METHODS:

Patients (n = 466) implanted with 2 5086MRI leads (EnRhythm MRI Study) and 316 patients implanted with 2 5076 leads in 2 prospective clinical investigations were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Electrical characteristics were stable in both groups at implant and at 12 months and were clinically acceptable throughout. Ventricular capture thresholds were slightly higher at 12 months for the 5086MRI lead than for the 5076 lead (0.93 ± 0.47 V vs 0.74 ± 0.42 V; P < .001). Ventricular sensing amplitudes for the 5086MRI lead were lower at implant (9.0 ± 4.7 mV vs 13.9 ± 6.9 mV; P < .001) and 12 months (9.8 ± 4.8 mV vs 15.4 ± 7.5 mV; P < .001) than for the 5076 lead. There was no statistical difference in lead handling. At 12 months, the estimated right atrial lead-related complication-free survival rate was 99.3% for the 5086MRI lead and 99.6% for the 5076 lead (log-rank P = .65), and the estimated right ventricular lead-related complication-free survival rates were 98.5% and 100% (log-rank P = .03). Acute lead dislodgments occurred in 12 patients with the 5086MRI leads (2.6%) compared with 2 patients with 5076 leads (0.6%) (p = .05) than in 0.6% of the patients with the 5076 lead (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

The 5086MRI lead demonstrates clinically acceptable electrical characteristics while providing safe access to MR-guided diagnostics. However, compared with the 5076 lead, the 5086MRI lead exhibits lower ventricular sensing, slightly higher ventricular capture thresholds, and higher acute lead dislodgement rate.

KEYWORDS:

5076; 5086MRI; CIED; CRT; MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging; RA; RF; RV; cardiac implantable electronic device; cardiac resynchronization therapy; magnetic resonance imaging; radiofrequency; right atrial; right ventricular

PMID:
24184788
DOI:
10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.056
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center