Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Feb;111(2):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Analysis of the misfit of dental implant-supported prostheses made with three manufacturing processes.

Author information

1
Research Technician, Biomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Materials Science, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
2
Private practice, Barcelona, Spain.
3
Assistant Professor, Biomaterials, Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering group, Department of Materials Science, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:

The microgap between implant components has been associated with complications such as screw loosening or adverse biologic responses.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to quantify the microroughness of the mating surfaces of implant components manufactured with different processes, to quantify the microgap between implant components, and to determine whether a correlation exists between microroughness and the microgap.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Nine dental implants with a standard external connection were paired with 3 milled, 3 cast, and 3 sintered compatible cobalt-chromium alloy abutments. The abutment surface was examined, and the roughness parameter Sz was measured by using a white-light interferometric microscope at ×10 to ×100 magnification. The abutment surface and the microgap of the implant-abutment connection were observed with scanning electron microscopy, and the microgap width was quantified from micrographs made of each implant-abutment pair. The mean and standard deviation of roughness and microgap were evaluated. A 1-way ANOVA (α=.05) was used to assess the influence of the manufacturing process on roughness and microgap. The Pearson correlation was used to check dependence between roughness and microgap.

RESULTS:

The milled abutments possessed a connection geometry with defined edges and a mean roughness of 29 μm, sintered abutments showed a blurred but functional connection with a roughness of 115 μm, and cast abutments showed a connection with a loss of axial symmetry and a roughness of 98 μm. A strong correlation was found between the roughness values on the mating surfaces and the microgap width.

CONCLUSIONS:

The milled components were smoother than the cast or sintered components. A correlation was found between surface roughness and microgap width.

PMID:
24176182
DOI:
10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.006
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center