Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Toxicol In Vitro. 2013 Dec;27(8):2316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 14.

Non-animal photosafety assessment approaches for cosmetics based on the photochemical and photobiochemical properties.

Author information

1
Department of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan. Electronic address: onoue@u-shizuoka-ken.ac.jp.

Abstract

The main purpose of the present study was to establish a non-animal photosafety assessment approach for cosmetics using in vitro photochemical and photobiochemical screening systems. Fifty-one cosmetics, pharmaceutics and other chemicals were selected as model chemicals on the basis of animal and/or clinical photosafety information. The model chemicals were assessed in terms of photochemical properties by UV/VIS spectral analysis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay and 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing (3T3 NRU PT). Most phototoxins exhibited potent UV/VIS absorption with molar extinction coefficients of over 1000M(-1)cm(-1), although false-negative prediction occurred for 2 cosmetic phototoxins owing to weak UV/VIS absorption. Among all the cosmetic ingredients, ca. 42% of tested chemicals were non-testable in the ROS assay because of low water solubility; thereby, micellar ROS (mROS) assay using a solubilizing surfactant was employed for follow-up screening. Upon combination use of ROS and mROS assays, the individual specificity was 88.2%, and the positive and negative predictivities were estimated to be 94.4% and 100%, respectively. In the 3T3 NRU PT, 3 cosmetics and 4 drugs were incorrectly predicted not to be phototoxic, although some of them were typical photoallergens. Thus, these in vitro screening systems individually provide false predictions; however, a systematic tiered approach using these assays could provide reliable photosafety assessment without any false-negatives. The combined use of in vitro assays might enable simple and fast non-animal photosafety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients.

KEYWORDS:

3T3 NRU PT; 3T3 neutral red uptake phototoxicity testing; ANOVA; CMC; Cosmetics; DMSO; ECVAM; European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods; ICH; IFRA; International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; International Fragrance Association; JPMA; JaCVAM; Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods; MEC; NBT; NaPB; OECD; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; PIF; Photochemical property; Photosafety assessment; Phototoxicity; ROS; Reactive oxygen species; UV; VIS light; critical micelle concentration; dimethyl sulfoxide; mROS assay; micellar ROS assay; molar extinction coefficient; nitroblue tetrazolium; one-way analysis of variance; photo human cell line activation test; photo-h-CLAT; photoirritation factor; reactive oxygen species; sodium phosphate buffer; ultraviolet; visible light

PMID:
24134854
DOI:
10.1016/j.tiv.2013.10.003
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center