Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.

Author information

1
Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane, Japan.
2
Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
3
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.
4
Deparment of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The bleeding risk after cold snare polypectomy in anticoagulated patients is not known.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the bleeding risk after cold snare polypectomy or conventional polypectomy for small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients.

DESIGN:

Prospective randomized controlled study.

SETTING:

Municipal hospital in Japan.

INTERVENTIONS:

Anticoagulated patients with colorectal polyps up to 10 mm in diameter were enrolled. Patients were randomized to polypectomy with either cold snare technique (Cold group) or conventional polypectomy (Conventional group) without discontinuation of warfarin. The primary outcome measure was delayed bleeding (ie, requiring endoscopic intervention within 2 weeks after polypectomy). Secondary outcome measures were immediate bleeding and retrieval rate of colorectal polyps.

RESULTS:

Seventy patients were randomized (159 polyps): Cold group (n = 35, 78 polyps) and Conventional group (n = 35; 81 polyps). The patients' demographic characteristics including international normalized ratio and the number, size, and shape of polyps removed were similar between the 2 techniques. Immediate bleeding during the procedure was more common with conventional polypectomy (23% [8/35]) compared with cold polypectomy (5.7% [2/35]) (P = .042). No delayed bleeding occurred in the Cold group, whereas 5 patients (14%) required endoscopic hemostasis in the Conventional group (P = .027). Complete polyp retrieval rates were identical (94% [73/78] vs 93% [75/81]). The presence of histologically demonstrated injured arteries in the submucosal layer with cold snare was significantly less than with conventional snare (22% vs 39%, P = .023).

LIMITATION:

Small sample size, single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS:

Delayed bleeding requiring hemostasis occurred significantly less commonly after cold snare polypectomy than conventional polypectomy despite continuation of anticoagulants. Cold snare polypectomy is preferred for removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:

NCT 01553565.).

PMID:
24125514
DOI:
10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center