Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Oct;113(10):776-87. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.047.

Medicare reform and primary care concerns for future physicians.

Author information

1
OMS IV, Lincoln Memorial University-DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, 362 E Sondley Dr, Asheville, NC 28805-1151. charles.mitchell581@lmunet.edu.

Abstract

The widening income gap between specialists and primary care physicians (PCPs) has spurred many physician associations to reform the current Resource-Based Relative Value Scale fee schedule and sustainable growth rate expenditure target system. Hoping to better represent primary care, the American Association of Family Physicians formed a task force in 2011 to suggest supplements to the Relative Value Update Committee's procedural code recommendations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. In addition, the predicted shortage of PCPs has caused many medical schools to increase class sizes; the scarcity of PCPs has also spurred the founding of new medical schools. Such measures, however, have not been met with more residency program sites or graduate medical education funding. The present article highlights major Medicare reform strategies and explores several issues affecting the field of primary care, including reimbursement, representation, and residency training.

PMID:
24084804
DOI:
10.7556/jaoa.2013.047
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Support Center