Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Sci Rep. 2013 Sep 26;3:2759. doi: 10.1038/srep02759.

Default cascades in complex networks: topology and systemic risk.

Author information

1
1] IRIDIA, ULB, Brussels, Belgium [2] SBS-EM Center E. Bernheim, ULB, Brussels, Belgium.

Abstract

The recent crisis has brought to the fore a crucial question that remains still open: what would be the optimal architecture of financial systems? We investigate the stability of several benchmark topologies in a simple default cascading dynamics in bank networks. We analyze the interplay of several crucial drivers, i.e., network topology, banks' capital ratios, market illiquidity, and random vs targeted shocks. We find that, in general, topology matters only--but substantially--when the market is illiquid. No single topology is always superior to others. In particular, scale-free networks can be both more robust and more fragile than homogeneous architectures. This finding has important policy implications. We also apply our methodology to a comprehensive dataset of an interbank market from 1999 to 2011.

PMID:
24067913
PMCID:
PMC3783890
DOI:
10.1038/srep02759
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center