Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 15;87(4):690-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.029. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

Predicting esophagitis after chemoradiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: david.palma@uwo.ca.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) improves survival compared with sequential treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but it increases toxicity, particularly radiation esophagitis (RE). Validated predictors of RE for clinical use are lacking. We performed an individual-patient-data meta-analysis to determine factors predictive of clinically significant RE.

METHODS AND MATERIALS:

After a systematic review of the literature, data were obtained on 1082 patients who underwent CCRT, including patients from Europe, North America, Asia, and Australia. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (2/3 vs 1/3 of patients). Factors predictive of RE (grade≥2 and grade≥3) were assessed using logistic modeling, with the concordance statistic (c statistic) used to evaluate the performance of each model.

RESULTS:

The median radiation therapy dose delivered was 65 Gy, and the median follow-up time was 2.1 years. Most patients (91%) received platinum-containing CCRT regimens. The development of RE was common, scored as grade 2 in 348 patients (32.2%), grade 3 in 185 (17.1%), and grade 4 in 10 (0.9%). There were no RE-related deaths. On univariable analysis using the training set, several baseline factors were statistically predictive of RE (P<.05), but only dosimetric factors had good discrimination scores (c>.60). On multivariable analysis, the esophageal volume receiving ≥60 Gy (V60) alone emerged as the best predictor of grade≥2 and grade≥3 RE, with good calibration and discrimination. Recursive partitioning identified 3 risk groups: low (V60<0.07%), intermediate (V60 0.07% to 16.99%), and high (V60≥17%). With use of the validation set, the predictive model performed inferiorly for the grade≥2 endpoint (c=.58) but performed well for the grade≥3 endpoint (c=.66).

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinically significant RE is common, but life-threatening complications occur in <1% of patients. Although several factors are statistically predictive of RE, the V60 alone provides the best predictive ability. Efforts to reduce the V60 should be prioritized, with further research needed to identify and validate new predictive factors.

PMID:
24035329
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.029
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center