Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Jan;14(1):87-99. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12154. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Samples from subdivided populations yield biased estimates of effective size that overestimate the rate of loss of genetic variation.

Author information

1
Division of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Many empirical studies estimating effective population size apply the temporal method that provides an estimate of the variance effective size through the amount of temporal allele frequency change under the assumption that the study population is completely isolated. This assumption is frequently violated, and the magnitude of the resulting bias is generally unknown. We studied how gene flow affects estimates of effective size obtained by the temporal method when sampling from a population system and provide analytical expressions for the expected estimate under an island model of migration. We show that the temporal method tends to systematically underestimate both local and global effective size when populations are connected by gene flow, and the bias is sometimes dramatic. The problem is particularly likely to occur when sampling from a subdivided population where high levels of gene flow obscure identification of subpopulation boundaries. In such situations, sampling in a manner that prevents biased estimates can be difficult. This phenomenon might partially explain the frequently reported unexpectedly low effective population sizes of marine populations that have raised concern regarding the genetic vulnerability of even exceptionally large populations.

KEYWORDS:

effective population size; subdivided populations; temporal method

PMID:
24034449
PMCID:
PMC4274017
DOI:
10.1111/1755-0998.12154
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center