Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Oct;14(10):730-6. doi: 10.1038/nrn3585. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

Neuroscientists in court.

Author information

1
The Law School and Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.

Abstract

Neuroscientific evidence is increasingly being offered in court cases. Consequently, the legal system needs neuroscientists to act as expert witnesses who can explain the limitations and interpretations of neuroscientific findings so that judges and jurors can make informed and appropriate inferences. The growing role of neuroscientists in court means that neuroscientists should be aware of important differences between the scientific and legal fields, and, especially, how scientific facts can be easily misunderstood by non-scientists, including judges and jurors.

PMID:
24026114
DOI:
10.1038/nrn3585
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Support Center