Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
PLoS Genet. 2013 Aug;9(8):e1003734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003734. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

Comparative oncogenomic analysis of copy number alterations in human and zebrafish tumors enables cancer driver discovery.

Author information

1
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

The identification of cancer drivers is a major goal of current cancer research. Finding driver genes within large chromosomal events is especially challenging because such alterations encompass many genes. Previously, we demonstrated that zebrafish malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are highly aneuploid, much like human tumors. In this study, we examined 147 zebrafish MPNSTs by massively parallel sequencing and identified both large and focal copy number alterations (CNAs). Given the low degree of conserved synteny between fish and mammals, we reasoned that comparative analyses of CNAs from fish versus human MPNSTs would enable elimination of a large proportion of passenger mutations, especially on large CNAs. We established a list of orthologous genes between human and zebrafish, which includes approximately two-thirds of human protein-coding genes. For the subset of these genes found in human MPNST CNAs, only one quarter of their orthologues were co-gained or co-lost in zebrafish, dramatically narrowing the list of candidate cancer drivers for both focal and large CNAs. We conclude that zebrafish-human comparative analysis represents a powerful, and broadly applicable, tool to enrich for evolutionarily conserved cancer drivers.

PMID:
24009526
PMCID:
PMC3757083
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1003734
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center