Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Can Geriatr J. 2013 Sep 4;16(3):120-42. doi: 10.5770/cgj.16.76. eCollection 2013.

Systematic review of the evidence for Trails B cut-off scores in assessing fitness-to-drive.

Author information

1
Division of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON; ; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON;

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Fitness-to-drive guidelines recommend employing the Trail Making B Test (a.k.a. Trails B), but do not provide guidance regarding cut-off scores. There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal cut-off score on the Trails B test. The objective of this study was to address this controversy by systematically reviewing the evidence for specific Trails B cut-off scores (e.g., cut-offs in both time to completion and number of errors) with respect to fitness-to-drive.

METHODS:

Systematic review of all prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, case-control, correlation, and cross-sectional studies reporting the ability of the Trails B to predict driving safety that were published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS:

Forty-seven articles were reviewed. None of the articles justified sample sizes via formal calculations. Cut-off scores reported based on research include: 90 seconds, 133 seconds, 147 seconds, 180 seconds, and < 3 errors.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is support for the previously published Trails B cut-offs of 3 minutes or 3 errors (the '3 or 3 rule'). Major methodological limitations of this body of research were uncovered including (1) lack of justification of sample size leaving studies open to Type II error (i.e., false negative findings), and (2) excessive focus on associations rather than clinically useful cut-off scores.

KEYWORDS:

Trail Making Test; Trails B; cut-off; driving; fitness-to-drive

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center